Assessing Public Participation in an Open Government Era
Submitted by rgordon on Tue, 08/16/2011 - 12:59
The plans of top agencies have been assessed by both the government and advocacy groups to see if they met the requirements laid out in the directives, often with an emphasis on the degree to which they increase transparency. This report focuses on how well these agency plans increase public participation and collaboration.
The authors compare what the large agencies say they plan to do, against the criteria used by professionals who conduct high-quality public participation initiatives in the non-profit world. The authors find most plans fail to define what constitutes high-quality public participation, but do “display an admirable willingness to experiment.”
The report provides details of best practices being applied by federal agencies in engaging the public on-line, face-to-face, and through formal mechanisms, as well as what agencies are doing to change their cultures to support greater participation by the public. It also offers a series of specific recommendations for what next steps the White House and agencies might take to spread these best practices across the government.